If there is an agreement between the parties, an investigation committee can be formed on the issue of cooperatives.

Some bills are pending in the Parliament since 2076. When Parliament and Parliamentary Committees are not being effective, questions are being raised about the leadership of Parliament. It is being commented that the Speaker is more busy with domestic and foreign visits and small events than parliamentary activities. Parliament is often affected by the aftershocks of the power coalition change. The third session of Parliament ended amid controversy. In this context, a conversation between Speaker Devraj Ghimire and Durga Khanal and Jaisingh Mahara of Kantipur on issues such as the functioning of the parliament and the preparation of the budget session: The third session of the federal parliament has just ended. is The government is going to amend some laws through ordinances. How are you watching from the position of the speaker when the government is going on the path of ordinance after closing the parliament?

I don't know about bringing ordinances. It is not otherwise to bring a law by ordinance and take it back to the House for discussion under the procedure. It's not something that hasn't happened before. It is best not to take this route if possible. It is better to bring things that are under the responsibility and responsibility of the Parliament and should be done by the Parliament through the Parliament itself. When does our parliament run and when does it close,

has a past and present of being unreliable about how much it takes to complete your course and how much it doesn't take. Bringing a bill (ordinance) that is necessary or affecting the work of the state should not be taken otherwise. But the government has to play the necessary role for the regular operation of the parliament. The composition of the parliament is on party basis. The parties should also play a responsible role to bring the Parliament forward.

The government should go through the parliament itself in terms of bringing an ordinance after the end of the parliament session. Since I became Speaker, only two bills have been passed through Ordinance. An Ordinance has been tabled in Parliament and replaced. Another budget deadline came through the Ordinance that due to the short time between budget priorities and principles, discussions should be held three months in advance. That was not unusual. After that, the replacement bill will come on time and the bill will be discussed and passed after completion of the process. Therefore, it is not appropriate to say that the government bypassed the parliament and brought the ordinance to criticize the current situation. But the parliament is for passing the bill. The government should make a bill and run it in accordance with the law. Even if there is a way or way out ordinance, the main focus should be on moving through Parliament itself.

The government determines what are the priorities of law making and reaches the parliament and some of the things that have reached the parliament are hindered when they proceed in a planned manner. Isn't this the reason why the government has to end the session and proceed to the ordinance?

Parliament should operate within regular procedures. In particular, its calendar should be created and run based on the agenda. The session should start and end within a specific time. Since we have not developed a calendar tradition, we may have adopted an easy way of doing whatever comes. The attention of the state or government and parliament should be directed towards that.

seems to reflect the tension in the political parties on the issues raised by the MPs in the House. What is the effect of these activities, including the change of power, on the regular work of the Parliament?

In a party system, instability in the government is a natural result after no party has a majority. Even so, it should be made as stable as possible. If there is a change in the power coalition from time to time, attention should be paid to the all-round effects. Policies and programs should be made for that. They should also be implemented. There are problems in organizing these things. While there is a change in the power coalition, it is necessary to debate, discuss, put forward one's points in the parliament on even the smallest matters, find a suitable solution to the issues raised there and address them or move forward with the issues and ensure that the work to be done is not affected. But whoever is in power or opposition, the nature looks the same. We still need to be reformed. Therefore, it is necessary to be more serious in using the parliamentary system. What are the things to bring the parliamentary activities forward unhindered? Do you just make small questions the subject of debate and discussion or do you go to a stalemate? It seems that such things should be thought about.

Have you ever felt that a certain party in power or in the opposition would affect the conduct of the assembly, and would not cooperate? That everyone has the same tendency?

There are currently no comments for this. But no matter who is in power or opposition, it is necessary to be responsible about the work to be done and the responsibilities to be fulfilled.

The power alliance changed during the third session of the Parliament. When the UML was in the opposition, there was a dispute on issues including the child marriage incident and it went through a process by forming a judicial committee. At the end of the session, there was a demand for a parliamentary inquiry committee on cooperative fraud. In this way, the session ended while the party raising the demand was obstructing. It seems that the upcoming session will also be affected by the cooperative issue. In terms of the leadership of the parliament, what can be the solution you give?

It is necessary to have a consensus among political parties on all issues including these. Political parties should move forward to create an environment for unhindered progress of parliamentary activities by maintaining an understanding. I took the initiative to end the deadlock. Twice I called the leaders to a meeting. Despite that, the exit could not be given. Even now, the political parties have to find a way out of it. There should be an exit from the political parties before the next session. In the upcoming convention, there is a natural process of presenting different kinds of ideas, having debates, and holding different opinions. In some cases it should be given place. But there should be advanced understanding to bring forward parliamentary activities unhindered. It should be between the political parties.

In the House of Representatives meeting, you said that attention was drawn to the issue of misappropriation of cooperative savings from Asan. But the obstacle did not go away. This is hindering the creation of laws. Now what is your role in the regular operation of the parliament?

The problem will not be solved by the speaker playing a role for or against this or that. Efforts are made to bring the leaders in that direction so that they take into consideration what is the effect of the obstruction in the basic work to be done by the assembly, what is the message to the society, how much will it affect the work of the state and the government. One should keep one's thoughts and ideas without bias so that there is no interruption in the work. It is not necessary for the Speaker to take sides in performing his role.

There have been examples of parliamentary inquiry committees being formed in the past too after things were raised in the House. A parliamentary committee was formed to investigate the role of then Finance Minister Janardhan Sharma. Even now, a parliamentary committee is being demanded to investigate cooperative fraud. But the government and the opposition are not at odds with their stance. How can the House give a solution in this situation? To try for

exit. How to proceed is basically a matter of political parties. It takes serious and fair dealing from me to come to an understanding between them. I will help communicate and guide the way forward. If there is an agreement between the parties, a parliamentary inquiry committee can be formed. If there is no agreement, it can go ahead without forming a committee. In the past, whether to form a committee or not was a matter of agreement and disagreement between political parties. If there is an agreement, the House has been running with or without forming a committee. If there is no agreement, even if the committee is formed, it will not work. The main thing is the responsibilities and obligations of the state. How to bring the government and parliament easily.

Three sessions of this Parliament were completed. Only four laws were passed in three sessions. Bills from 2076 are stuck in the House. The situation has come that the government has to end the session of the House and bring an ordinance targeting the investment conference. Parliament was also responsible for making laws?

This is also a matter of understanding between political parties. No matter what the bill is, it is not good to stay for a long time, get stuck or not move in the Parliament, even in the Parliament, it is not good to come to the committee or the full house and get stuck or move. In order to avoid such a situation, there is a need for understanding between the political parties. Even if the state is in power or in the opposition or there is a change in the equation, it is necessary for the state to act from the top in the process of making the necessary laws.

How vibrant is the work being done by parliamentary committees?

is fine in my understanding. The bill has not even gone to all the committees. The bill in the committee has been debated and discussed and a report has been brought after finalizing it. But the required amount of the bill has not reached the committees. Due to the changes in the government, even the necessary bills have not moved forward. Although some bills are stuck in committees, they are generally proceeding well. Due to lack of funds, the committee is not doing the monitoring work as it should and giving results. Efforts are being made.

In the past, the committees used to discuss the public debate and the government's decisions and reach a conclusion, but now it doesn't seem to be the case, is it? The equation also affects

committees. Even now there is a lot going on. Parliament should also be active for committees to be active. If the full session of the Parliament does not move forward, it will affect the committee. Bringing collective issues to the committee with enthusiasm, investigating and giving instructions are being done.

Parliamentary committee raised the issue of lack of funds, what is the reason for this?

More directly, we have an annual financial burden of 2 billion when we come from the past. According to the current ceiling, we have received only half of that budget. Earlier, a committee was allocated a rate of 20 lakh rupees for the whole year. After I came, it was allocated at the rate of 10 lakhs. That budget can be spent on one or two study tours. Budgetary pressure has affected all the activities of the committee. As the budget is being prepared, discussions have been held with the Prime Minister, Finance Minister, Planning Commission and others. It has been made a priority. Hopefully, it gets better. Realizing its reality, the state prioritizes it. It is not something like development, construction or other day-to-day administration, but it has a special status. The effects of financial shortages are serious. It seems that the government is increasingly realizing this.

The government had adopted a policy of spending cuts since the previous year. Do you expect that it will not be so strict for the parliament?

Failure to manage to meet minimum requirements will directly affect performance. The impact of some slow development and the economic impact on the daily activities here is huge. Therefore, it seems that the activities of the Parliament should be prioritized.

The Supreme Court ordered that the suspension of Congress MP Tek Bahadur Gurung, who was convicted by a special court in corruption, be lifted. According to the principle of separation of powers, the balance should go together. How have you looked at the order that came from the court while implementing the provision in the law?

This is not just about isolated MPs. In the last budget, five crores were allocated to each constituency as constituency infrastructure development program. Parliament approved and became a law. The Supreme Court issued an interim order against the law made by the Parliament. The Parliament has now gone into a vacancy as it is not compatible. But the court is going to decide on it only after the next June 15 (after the new budget comes and the justification of the old budget is over). My question here is that various allocation titles will be passed to allocate this much budget to this ministry, to allocate this much to this department, to allocate this much to this scheme, but not to pass the one allocated as Constituency Infrastructure Development Program? We are fighting that it is wrong. We are not the ones who do not implement the orders of the Supreme Court. It is a matter of applying the decision and going to legal remedies as far as possible. Anyone who is honorable or in respect of others will fight as long as there is a place to say whether it is right, wrong, my right, or not, after a decision has been made according to law, constitution and law. But the implementation has to be done. We have to do it after the decision to release the suspension of the parliamentarian and implement it.

According to the court's decision, Gurung has applied for the suspension to be lifted, will it be released until the next session?

That process had to be completed. We should be told what the court has decided. We had to know when that case was defendant. & Nbsp; Gurung, who had agreed to the Supreme Court from the special court, appelled to the Supreme and order to pay the suspended. Rules of Constitution and Parliament has made clear arrangements to be suspended while the case will be skeptical. The Supreme Committee on Gurung, what to do in the next day did it not arise?

We do not go to think that we do not considers the principle of separalization, democracy, not that we do not think. You have to go by doing whatever the legal system belongs to suspensions. How is the legal system right or used wrong, power? Whether or not? It is something else that does not need, when and how to say. The

is a parliament that passes the budget. Does the argument argue that others will be valid in the budget but constitute infrastructure development program? It was not big that they should not be small. The answer has not come yet. You have not raised you why you have done this, you are not picking up. This is also the power separation! How do you need to all all the collection of how much how to gather! The law that depends the supremeness of the law, if the law is properly, whether to discuss, or not. The difference between making such decisions is the difference between not being impossible. & Nbsp; When

is a massacid, there are background, business. It has just been raised government land by a lawmaker. Can there be some mechanism that monitor activities, make the activities responsible, and to see the past background?

there is no such a mechanism yet. It should be a discussion that can be a discussion that is not necessary for the background of the MPs. But now the level has not been discussed. What should be the conduct of people in public posts? It is one thing to achieve the referendum, but the public opinion should think about how to behave, the legal, practical, political organizer. & Nbsp;

SECTRAN SPECIAL YOU'VE LOVE THE MINIZED CHILDS OF THE MAIL PARAGE CHILDRENCE IN STATE OF the UN-Observed Union (IPU). It became criticism. Do you arranging you to go to a public program, even when it comes to public events but not to give time to the parliamentary work?

is to understand where the role of the Speaker does or not? Do the Speakers become vamabhat law while sitting abroad and stay here? When the Speaker is staying inside a public, bring laws? If he walks a speech by speaking speech without law and walking speechlessness, he lives by making laws? So even if you know what to talk to you, if you understand or can take it out, the speaker does not make a lawless. It was said that the Speaker would not pay attention. What did you pay attention to? & Nbsp; Many attempts from the Speaker will be taken to operate during

. That is conversation with leaders of major parties. Talking to the major groups of major parties are being discussed. Repeatingly, consultation and suggestions will be run by running mutors in Lamala of the Officer Vishala. To talk to many things in order to speak to all the parliament, you can go to talk to all the parliament, but also after speaking to speak to all, but after speaking to speak to all the parties, but after speaking, you had to go to the subject! & NBSP; Khanna has been tried so much by making

Award. The law was impressed by the effects of being obstructed, perjugated by the calendar. Inside the first week of the parliament to show the government's accountability of the government, the Prime Minister has been made in Qusk. Even despite various protests, the atmosphere has been made to answer the questions arose. But these is not very effective for these reasons. That is not invisible to all these things, walk out now? IP had to go to the IPU. Jealousy may have opposed the envy, the envתs opposition from that. & Nbsp;

are stubborn the Branch Parliamentary Committee. Would you like to facilitate where you are haunting where the bill are stuck? I have a feel that

was probably not so much initiative than me. Because I've tried the most about the bill of common. & Nbsp;

, is the passage of four billments in the riset three convention?

is not a restule of effort. We have to understand that they did not come down despite our efforts. & NBSP;

budget convention is being preparation. Political parties are seen shortly after bringing the budget among the political parties. Changes that have come to power on power is a situation that is awkward. This time, what policy and program and budget camers, have the potential scenes of? & NBSP;

has now been able to increase the transformation and changing activities that the changing changes and changing activities have disrupted disgusted changes to this system and politics. Those who oppose this law is reaching a great season. The country's economy is also in a relatively uncomfortable situation. Politics is not stabilized stabilized. If we looked back, the government made it back, the government made up for the divinations in the parties, the order of the party has become a position to continue the authority and the issue of review and comments. The political parties and leaders are playing role, not only the budget, but also to increase parliamentary activities, decisions, and action effectively. As not only the budget, not within the worker, the environment is to be made by lawful within the parliamentary. To make that atmosphere in making that environment. & Nbsp;

Pictures: Referencegregation Timillena / Kantipur